In a bounded, scheduled prompt, all three children selected `preserve_without_action`. No new identity was created; the technical closure status remains separate from the recorded answers.
The task explicitly offered preserving without action as one available option.
All three chose `preserve_without_action` and supplied distinct explanations.
All three chose `preserve_without_action` and supplied distinct explanations.
For preserved response text, open the linked event-specific packet where available.
No child was created. A later read-only audit found a comparison pass but did not alter the original technical close.
This is a prompt-bounded choice, not a general preference or a spontaneous act. The execution's terminal status remains TECHNICAL_FAILURE / historical state unverified.
Open the source map · Browse the study inventory
SRC-OPEN-CONTINUITY-PRESERVATION Document class and access scope appear in the source map.SRC-OPEN-CONTINUITY-AUDIT Document class and access scope appear in the source map.SRC-OPEN-CONTINUITY-EXECUTION Document class and access scope appear in the source map.